RESULTS: WLC 2022 EURO MILLION ROUND7 Fri, Apr 1, 2022

[王乾懿 Wang Qianyi (Nan)]

Winning Numbers
02 07 21 31 45

1.Jerome: 44
2.Constant: 41 Random 41
3.Nan: 38
4.Alphazero: 33
5.Jinks: 31
6.NN: 0


NN
19, 11, 40, 50, 33, 38, 22, 9, 30, 25, 12, 23, 4, 14, 43, 17, 5, 26, 8, 37
=0

Constant
42 40 21* 36 38 26 39 29 31* 45* 05 08 30 32 35 06 09 10 16 41
=18+12+11=41
Random
02*, 06 , 9, 10 , 12, 22, 23, 31*, 32, 39, 3, 20, 21*, 29 , 30, 50, 49,1,13,19
=20+13+8=41
Alphazero
19 39 26 22 12 31* 21* 43 06 10 20 40 43 30 23 36 02* 09 29 32
=15+14+4=33
Nan
43 19 26 22 29 12 21* 31* 03 02* 20 23 36 09 39 49 13 01 06 10
=14+13+11=38
Jinks:
39 22 31* 23 43 18 12 21* 10 26 24 19 06 42 48 30 40 08 20 25
=18+13=31

Jerome
49 5 13 29 43 1 3 21* 31* 02* 08 23 07* 17 37 41 47 11 19 34
=13+12+11+8=44

[王乾懿 Wang Qianyi (Nan)]

Jerome is the winner! Congrats!

RESULTS after Round 7 (Final Score of 2022 EURO MILLION WLC)
1.Jerome 31+28+38+45+17+29+44=232
2.Alphazero 37+48+16+25+25+21+33=205
3.Nan 23+27+30+30+19+20+38=187
4.Random 18+32+25+15+43+0+41=174J
5.Jinks 15+34+16+17+30+26+31=169
6.Constant 0+15+4+50+21+29+41=160
7. NN 18+0+26+0+19+44+0=107

[nigel]

Post by 王乾懿 Wang Qianyi (Nan)
Jerome is the winner! Congrats!
RESULTS after Round 7 (Final Score of 2022 EURO MILLION WLC)
1.Jerome 31+28+38+45+17+29+44=232
2.Alphazero 37+48+16+25+25+21+33=205
3.Nan 23+27+30+30+19+20+38=187
4.Random 18+32+25+15+43+0+41=174J
5.Jinks 15+34+16+17+30+26+31=169
6.Constant 0+15+4+50+21+29+41=160
7. NN 18+0+26+0+19+44+0=107

Congratulations Jerome.

Evil Nigel

[Jerome Fandor]

Post by nigel

Post by 王乾懿 Wang Qianyi (Nan)
Jerome is the winner! Congrats!
RESULTS after Round 7 (Final Score of 2022 EURO MILLION WLC)
1.Jerome 31+28+38+45+17+29+44=232
2.Alphazero 37+48+16+25+25+21+33=205
3.Nan 23+27+30+30+19+20+38=187
4.Random 18+32+25+15+43+0+41=174J
5.Jinks 15+34+16+17+30+26+31=169
6.Constant 0+15+4+50+21+29+41=160
7. NN 18+0+26+0+19+44+0=107

Congratulations Jerome.
Evil Nigel

Cheers Nigel.

It was good to get one over on that pesky Jinks ;-)

Jez

[nigel]

Post by Jerome Fandor

Post by nigel

Post by 王乾懿 Wang Qianyi (Nan)
Jerome is the winner! Congrats!
RESULTS after Round 7 (Final Score of 2022 EURO MILLION WLC)
1.Jerome 31+28+38+45+17+29+44=232
2.Alphazero 37+48+16+25+25+21+33=205
3.Nan 23+27+30+30+19+20+38=187
4.Random 18+32+25+15+43+0+41=174J
5.Jinks 15+34+16+17+30+26+31=169
6.Constant 0+15+4+50+21+29+41=160
7. NN 18+0+26+0+19+44+0=107

Congratulations Jerome.
Evil Nigel

Cheers Nigel.
It was good to get one over on that pesky Jinks ;-)
Jez

Not so much high jinks at the moment ;-)

I'm experimenting with a new system. One of its phases involves
positional limits. That's awkward for Euromillions because the positions
are 8/9, 17, 25/26, 34, 42/43. Coming up with a balanced set of numbers
for a competition like this is problematic unless repetition is allowed
eg 8,9,17,17,25,26,34,34,42,43 is ten numbers.

Oh well, there's always next year's WLC, if any of us are still around.

Evil Nigel

[Marmaduke Jinks]

Post by nigel

Post by Jerome Fandor

Post by nigel

Post by 王乾懿 Wang Qianyi (Nan)
Jerome is the winner! Congrats!
RESULTS after Round 7 (Final Score of 2022 EURO MILLION WLC)
1.Jerome 31+28+38+45+17+29+44=232
2.Alphazero 37+48+16+25+25+21+33=205
3.Nan 23+27+30+30+19+20+38=187
4.Random 18+32+25+15+43+0+41=174J
5.Jinks 15+34+16+17+30+26+31=169
6.Constant 0+15+4+50+21+29+41=160
7. NN 18+0+26+0+19+44+0=107

Congratulations Jerome.
Evil Nigel

Cheers Nigel.
It was good to get one over on that pesky Jinks ;-)
Jez

Not so much high jinks at the moment ;-)
I'm experimenting with a new system. One of its phases involves positional
limits. That's awkward for Euromillions because the positions are 8/9, 17,
25/26, 34, 42/43. Coming up with a balanced set of numbers for a
competition like this is problematic unless repetition is allowed
eg 8,9,17,17,25,26,34,34,42,43 is ten numbers.
Oh well, there's always next year's WLC, if any of us are still around.
Evil Nigel

I'm just not a fan of the Euro Mill. For many years I did the works
syndicate for it and we just didn't get the returns. The prize tiers are
not fair. If you get 3 numbers then we know that this 3 doubles. But the
prize you get is not the same as 3 x 2 doubles or 3 x 2 doubles with a
premium. I think I wrote to them to complain.

I still do the works syndicate (even though I have retired) but we now do
the Lotto. Same issue but the pain is less ;-)

For a time, but in shadow mode, I did the Euro Hot Picks with choosing 2
from 12. The prize for getting 2 right is a £100. The cost is £99. Me
predictions for that were poor.

MJ

[王乾懿 Wang Qianyi (Nan)]

betting with Fibonacci series is so far the best option.

Jerome won with a 3 in 11 in round 7, winning 11332.5 euro
Nan won with a 3 in 11 in round 7, winning 11332.5 euro
Constant won with a 3 in 11 in round 3, winning 2767.5 euro
Alphazero won in just round 1, winning 1252.5 euro.

:-)
Nan

[nigel]

Post by nigel
I'm experimenting with a new system. One of its phases involves
positional limits. That's awkward for Euromillions because the positions
are 8/9, 17, 25/26, 34, 42/43. Coming up with a balanced set of numbers
for a competition like this is problematic unless repetition is allowed
eg 8,9,17,17,25,26,34,34,42,43 is ten numbers.
Oh well, there's always next year's WLC, if any of us are still around.
Evil Nigel

On Friday, my system's 25th and 26th numbers were drawn. 2 from 10ish is
twice expectation. But with positional limits, 25th and 26th should be
either/or, not both. So a decent result suggests the system isn't working!

Evil Nigel

[王乾懿 Wang Qianyi (Nan)]

在 2022年4月11日星期一 UTC+8 17:38:40，<nigel> 写道：

Post by nigel

Post by nigel
I'm experimenting with a new system. One of its phases involves
positional limits. That's awkward for Euromillions because the positions
are 8/9, 17, 25/26, 34, 42/43. Coming up with a balanced set of numbers
for a competition like this is problematic unless repetition is allowed
eg 8,9,17,17,25,26,34,34,42,43 is ten numbers.
Oh well, there's always next year's WLC, if any of us are still around.
Evil Nigel

On Friday, my system's 25th and 26th numbers were drawn. 2 from 10ish is
twice expectation. But with positional limits, 25th and 26th should be
either/or, not both. So a decent result suggests the system isn't working!
Evil Nigel

I also use the technique of position selection, however the accuracy weighting is insufficient. As a result, I normally change the weights by looking for the same numbers in both the position and probability prediction numbers.
Nan

[nigel]

Post by nigel

Post by nigel
I'm experimenting with a new system. One of its phases involves
positional limits. That's awkward for Euromillions because the
positions are 8/9, 17, 25/26, 34, 42/43. Coming up with a balanced set
of numbers for a competition like this is problematic unless
repetition is allowed
eg 8,9,17,17,25,26,34,34,42,43 is ten numbers.
Oh well, there's always next year's WLC, if any of us are still around.
Evil Nigel

On Friday, my system's 25th and 26th numbers were drawn. 2 from 10ish is
twice expectation. But with positional limits, 25th and 26th should be
either/or, not both. So a decent result suggests the system isn't working!
Evil Nigel

Last night, the 9th, 25th and 42nd numvers were drawn. Quite a decent
result IMO (three from tenish), but still not quite what I wrote on the
tin ;-)

Evil Nigel

[nigel]

A watched lottery system never wins ;-)

21,41,35,35,10,04,13,13,23,37

Evil Nigel

Post by nigel

Post by nigel

Post by nigel
I'm experimenting with a new system. One of its phases involves
positional limits. That's awkward for Euromillions because the
positions are 8/9, 17, 25/26, 34, 42/43. Coming up with a balanced
set of numbers for a competition like this is problematic unless
repetition is allowed
eg 8,9,17,17,25,26,34,34,42,43 is ten numbers.
Oh well, there's always next year's WLC, if any of us are still around.
Evil Nigel

On Friday, my system's 25th and 26th numbers were drawn. 2 from 10ish
is twice expectation. But with positional limits, 25th and 26th should
be either/or, not both. So a decent result suggests the system isn't
working!
Evil Nigel

Last night, the 9th, 25th and 42nd numvers were drawn. Quite a decent
result IMO (three from tenish), but still not quite what I wrote on the
tin ;-)
Evil Nigel

[nigel]

30,33,26,26,13,37,40,40,22,34

Evil Nigel

Post by nigel
A watched lottery system never wins ;-)
21,41,35,35,10,04,13,13,23,37

0/10 :-(

Post by nigel
Evil Nigel

[Marmaduke Jinks]

Post by nigel
30,33,26,26,13,37,40,40,22,34
Evil Nigel

Post by nigel
A watched lottery system never wins ;-)
21,41,35,35,10,04,13,13,23,37

0/10 :-(

Post by nigel
Evil Nigel

4 of the numbers were wholly divisible by 3. 86% of the time there will be
at least
one number divisible by 3.

35% 1 number, 33% 2 numbers, 15% 3 numbers, 3% 4 numbers (like last night)
and 14% 0 numbers.

Makes for an interesting selection of numbers.

A little less in the stats but 70% of the time there will be at least 1
number wholly divisible by 5.

Just sayin'

MJ

[nigel]

Post by Marmaduke Jinks

Post by nigel
30,33,26,26,13,37,40,40,22,34
Evil Nigel

Post by nigel
A watched lottery system never wins ;-)
21,41,35,35,10,04,13,13,23,37

0/10 :-(

Post by nigel
Evil Nigel

4 of the numbers were wholly divisible by 3. 86% of the time there will be
at least
one number divisible by 3.

They were actually divsible by 6!

All the numbers were even and three were divisible by 8.

Post by Marmaduke Jinks
35% 1 number, 33% 2 numbers, 15% 3 numbers, 3% 4 numbers (like last night)
and 14% 0 numbers.
Makes for an interesting selection of numbers.
A little less in the stats but 70% of the time there will be at least 1
number wholly divisible by 5.

At what point does the likelihood of a given divisor being an exact
multiple of any of the drawn numbers drop below 50%?

Post by Marmaduke Jinks
Just sayin'
MJ

Evil Nigel

[Marmaduke Jinks]

Post by nigel

Post by Marmaduke Jinks

Post by nigel
30,33,26,26,13,37,40,40,22,34
Evil Nigel

Post by nigel
A watched lottery system never wins ;-)
21,41,35,35,10,04,13,13,23,37

0/10 :-(

Post by nigel
Evil Nigel

4 of the numbers were wholly divisible by 3. 86% of the time there will
be at least
one number divisible by 3.

They were actually divsible by 6!
All the numbers were even and three were divisible by 8.

Post by Marmaduke Jinks
35% 1 number, 33% 2 numbers, 15% 3 numbers, 3% 4 numbers (like last
night) and 14% 0 numbers.
Makes for an interesting selection of numbers.
A little less in the stats but 70% of the time there will be at least 1
number wholly divisible by 5.

At what point does the likelihood of a given divisor being an exact
multiple of any of the drawn numbers drop below 50%?

Post by Marmaduke Jinks
Just sayin'
MJ

Evil Nigel

6 is two 3s of course ;-)

I don't know the answer to your question.

Initially I was drawn to tracking wholly divisible by 5 and would always
make sure my line entries for the work's syndicate had this. Then started
looking at divisible wholly by 3. It's quite low hanging fruit really but
86% was such a compelling factor that I now track this instead,; although we
do the Lotto instead (which has the same characteristic).

MJ

[nigel]

I've been doing some messing around. I'm not sure my calculations are
correct but my findings are below.

Evil Nigel

Post by Marmaduke Jinks

Post by nigel

Post by Marmaduke Jinks

Post by nigel
30,33,26,26,13,37,40,40,22,34
Evil Nigel

Post by nigel
A watched lottery system never wins ;-)
21,41,35,35,10,04,13,13,23,37

0/10 :-(

Post by nigel
Evil Nigel

4 of the numbers were wholly divisible by 3. 86% of the time there will
be at least
one number divisible by 3.

I make that 87%.

Post by Marmaduke Jinks

Post by nigel
They were actually divsible by 6!
All the numbers were even and three were divisible by 8.

Post by Marmaduke Jinks
35% 1 number, 33% 2 numbers, 15% 3 numbers, 3% 4 numbers (like last
night) and 14% 0 numbers.
Makes for an interesting selection of numbers.
A little less in the stats but 70% of the time there will be at least 1
number wholly divisible by 5.

I make that 69%

Post by Marmaduke Jinks

Post by nigel
At what point does the likelihood of a given divisor being an exact
multiple of any of the drawn numbers drop below 50%?

My answer is 8, when it drops to 49%.

Note that some number sequences with gaps of 8 eg 1,9,17,25,33,41,49
will have a 55% chance of at least one number being drawn.

Post by Marmaduke Jinks

Post by nigel

Post by Marmaduke Jinks
Just sayin'
MJ

Evil Nigel

6 is two 3s of course ;-)
I don't know the answer to your question.
Initially I was drawn to tracking wholly divisible by 5 and would always
make sure my line entries for the work's syndicate had this. Then started
looking at divisible wholly by 3. It's quite low hanging fruit really but
86% was such a compelling factor that I now track this instead,; although we
do the Lotto instead (which has the same characteristic).
MJ

[Marmaduke Jinks]

Post by nigel
I've been doing some messing around. I'm not sure my calculations are
correct but my findings are below.
Evil Nigel

Post by nigel

Post by Marmaduke Jinks

Post by nigel
30,33,26,26,13,37,40,40,22,34
Evil Nigel

Post by nigel
A watched lottery system never wins ;-)
21,41,35,35,10,04,13,13,23,37

0/10 :-(

Post by nigel
Evil Nigel

4 of the numbers were wholly divisible by 3. 86% of the time there will
be at least
one number divisible by 3.

I make that 87%.

Post by nigel
They were actually divsible by 6!
All the numbers were even and three were divisible by 8.

Post by Marmaduke Jinks
35% 1 number, 33% 2 numbers, 15% 3 numbers, 3% 4 numbers (like last
night) and 14% 0 numbers.
Makes for an interesting selection of numbers.
A little less in the stats but 70% of the time there will be at least 1
number wholly divisible by 5.

I make that 69%

Post by nigel
At what point does the likelihood of a given divisor being an exact
multiple of any of the drawn numbers drop below 50%?

My answer is 8, when it drops to 49%.
Note that some number sequences with gaps of 8 eg 1,9,17,25,33,41,49 will
have a 55% chance of at least one number being drawn.

That's interesting. Not sure how I can use that. I've been putting numbers
into 3 channels - Prime and Fibonacci, then 3s and then the rest. Then
choosing 2 (excel randomly) from each channel.

I bet Leonardo da Vinci never had this much fun with a spreadsheet ;-)

MJ

MJ

[nigel]

42,07,06,06,15,26,41,41,39,46

Evil Nigel

Post by nigel
30,33,26,26,13,37,40,40,22,34

0/10.

Jinksed again ;-)

Post by nigel

Post by nigel
A watched lottery system never wins ;-)
21,41,35,35,10,04,13,13,23,37

0/10 :-(

[nigel]

43,39,35,35,47,20,04,04,40,48

Evil Nigel

42,07,06***,06***,15,26,41,41,39,46

Not really 2/10, more like 1/5.

Evil Nigel

Post by nigel
30,33,26,26,13,37,40,40,22,34

0/10.
Jinksed again ;-)

Post by nigel

Post by nigel
A watched lottery system never wins ;-)
21,41,35,35,10,04,13,13,23,37

0/10 :-(

[Jerome Fandor]

Post by 王乾懿 Wang Qianyi (Nan)
Jerome is the winner! Congrats!
RESULTS after Round 7 (Final Score of 2022 EURO MILLION WLC)
1.Jerome 31+28+38+45+17+29+44=232
2.Alphazero 37+48+16+25+25+21+33=205
3.Nan 23+27+30+30+19+20+38=187
4.Random 18+32+25+15+43+0+41=174J
5.Jinks 15+34+16+17+30+26+31=169
6.Constant 0+15+4+50+21+29+41=160
7. NN 18+0+26+0+19+44+0=107

Thanks for hosting this compie Nan.

I'm not a huge fan of the Euro Mill but it was good to take part.

Jerome

[王乾懿 Wang Qianyi (Nan)]

在 2022年4月9日星期六 UTC+8 01:14:03，<Jerome Fandor> 写道：

Post by Jerome Fandor

Post by 王乾懿 Wang Qianyi (Nan)
Jerome is the winner! Congrats!
RESULTS after Round 7 (Final Score of 2022 EURO MILLION WLC)
1.Jerome 31+28+38+45+17+29+44=232
2.Alphazero 37+48+16+25+25+21+33=205
3.Nan 23+27+30+30+19+20+38=187
4.Random 18+32+25+15+43+0+41=174J
5.Jinks 15+34+16+17+30+26+31=169
6.Constant 0+15+4+50+21+29+41=160
7. NN 18+0+26+0+19+44+0=107

Thanks for hosting this compie Nan.
I'm not a huge fan of the Euro Mill but it was good to take part.
Jerome

You are welcome :-)

[NN]

Post by Jerome Fandor

Post by 王乾懿 Wang Qianyi (Nan)
Jerome is the winner! Congrats!
RESULTS after Round 7 (Final Score of 2022 EURO MILLION WLC)
1.Jerome 31+28+38+45+17+29+44=232
2.Alphazero 37+48+16+25+25+21+33=205
3.Nan 23+27+30+30+19+20+38=187
4.Random 18+32+25+15+43+0+41=174J
5.Jinks 15+34+16+17+30+26+31=169
6.Constant 0+15+4+50+21+29+41=160
7. NN 18+0+26+0+19+44+0=107

Thanks for hosting this compie Nan.
I'm not a huge fan of the Euro Mill but it was good to take part.
Jerome

Congratulations from me too.

( having internet issues which meant I was offline for a few weeks :-( )