Ion Saliu
2019-02-25 23:42:24 UTC
'Bookie Lottery' in rec.gambling.lottery is the appanage of one Doollow (aka Evil Nigel). The topic came back recently. I didn't think it was in the proper forum:
• https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!topic/rec.gambling.lottery/OR5o1HDcy-U
• "The Best RGL Posts All-Matters Lottery, Software, Strategies, Systems".
The bookie resident asked a few questions about Parpaluck's lottery systems. I decided to create a new thread focused on the topic. Thusly I deleted my posts from the aforementioned thread and created this one.
• Doollow: "By what criteria do you consider your skip systems to be the best?"
• Mathematics and statistical analyses.
• The ranges of analyses are based on mathematics. Long ranges of skip generation are ineffective — that’s exactly what the cuckoos in WLC do. Their long-range skips hit ‘4 in 24’ winning numbers once in a blue moon. And the ‘drugged representative’ of the ‘Year of the Pig’ considers the event a “profit”! Lose millions of quids in 20 trials, and that’s makes it a profit! Similar to what Hermaphrodite Kotskarr believes: He is a ‘Man’ AND a ‘Woman’!
• Doollow: “Do they win more money for users than competing systems?”
• The only other lottery skip system is Gail Howard’s. But she started her system based on gut-feeling, not math(s). Her skips were determined in rapport to the last 5 and 10 lotto draws — regardless of game format.
• There is no record of Gail Howard’s lotto skips system hitting from draw to drawing over a period of 1000 tries, a 6/49 lotto game considered.
• By the same token, my lotto skip system records consistently about 2 ‘6 of 6’ hits in 100 drawings — about 18-20 hits in 1000.
• However, I stressed this is not the best way to apply the lottery skip systems — in their ‘non-positional form’. The ‘positional skip systems’ are far more effective. Furthermore, one should — and must — eliminate all non-positional combinations from the positional output. That method can also construct the best lotto wheel for any game format. These are some of the most relevant threads in r.g.l.
• https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!topic/rec.gambling.lottery/3Ig_U8j0OTk
• Skips in Lottery, Lotto: Strategy, Systems, Systems, Software
• https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!topic/rec.gambling.lottery/3HpqDeN0470
• Lottery Systems: Non-, Positional Frequency, Mega Millions, Powerball, Euromillions
• https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!topic/rec.gambling.lottery/POhE9g-u9XA
• NEW WORLD-RECORD LOTTO WHEEL W(54, 3 of 6) = 274.
• Doollow: “Are they used to generate the RANDOM entry in this year's WLC?”
• I expressed HONESTLY my opinion on WLC on several occasions in this very hou’ Kotkoduck and Kokostirk built. They don’t participate in WLC, either. They regard WLC the same way I do: an exercise in insanity. “One single winning number out of 24 is more valuable than 6 winning numbers — the jackpot!!!”
• You assuredly get better results if applying my lotto-skips systems. The ‘secret” is to go back a number of draws and then create the skips based on the ‘parpaluck’ advised by my software. As you’ve seen, a non-positional skip system hits only 2 times in 100 draws. It’s an average of 50 draws in a 6/49 game. Make it 60 draws in your game.
• So, you go back 60 draws in your history file. In other words, delete the top-60 drawings and save the file under a different name. Create the skips systems based on that file.
• If it happened that your new skip system already hit a ‘6 of 6’ in the last 60 drawings, delete the last 59 draws, etc. Most likely, you don’t have to delete more than 55 past draws off the top of your real-drawings file.
• Instead of skips, you can apply the same strategy in rapport to the MOST FREQUENT lotto numbers.
• After going back 60 draws and creating the skips/frequency system (of 24 numbers), play it for the duration of WLC — unchanged. Your hits will definitely improve. Problem is, everybody else will play the same system! You, the cuckoo participants, can add variation by applying different ‘parpalucks’ (ranges of analyses).
• But be mindful, cuckoos, you “playing’ 134596 combinations multiplied by 20. You must win at least ONE JACKPOT in order to be SUCCESSFUL! Otherwise, you’d be in the same category as the ‘drugged porcupine of the ‘Year of the Eastern Pig’. You’d lose millions, but would shout you made a profit!!!
Parpaluck,
Founder of Lottery Mathematics
• https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!topic/rec.gambling.lottery/OR5o1HDcy-U
• "The Best RGL Posts All-Matters Lottery, Software, Strategies, Systems".
The bookie resident asked a few questions about Parpaluck's lottery systems. I decided to create a new thread focused on the topic. Thusly I deleted my posts from the aforementioned thread and created this one.
• Doollow: "By what criteria do you consider your skip systems to be the best?"
• Mathematics and statistical analyses.
• The ranges of analyses are based on mathematics. Long ranges of skip generation are ineffective — that’s exactly what the cuckoos in WLC do. Their long-range skips hit ‘4 in 24’ winning numbers once in a blue moon. And the ‘drugged representative’ of the ‘Year of the Pig’ considers the event a “profit”! Lose millions of quids in 20 trials, and that’s makes it a profit! Similar to what Hermaphrodite Kotskarr believes: He is a ‘Man’ AND a ‘Woman’!
• Doollow: “Do they win more money for users than competing systems?”
• The only other lottery skip system is Gail Howard’s. But she started her system based on gut-feeling, not math(s). Her skips were determined in rapport to the last 5 and 10 lotto draws — regardless of game format.
• There is no record of Gail Howard’s lotto skips system hitting from draw to drawing over a period of 1000 tries, a 6/49 lotto game considered.
• By the same token, my lotto skip system records consistently about 2 ‘6 of 6’ hits in 100 drawings — about 18-20 hits in 1000.
• However, I stressed this is not the best way to apply the lottery skip systems — in their ‘non-positional form’. The ‘positional skip systems’ are far more effective. Furthermore, one should — and must — eliminate all non-positional combinations from the positional output. That method can also construct the best lotto wheel for any game format. These are some of the most relevant threads in r.g.l.
• https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!topic/rec.gambling.lottery/3Ig_U8j0OTk
• Skips in Lottery, Lotto: Strategy, Systems, Systems, Software
• https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!topic/rec.gambling.lottery/3HpqDeN0470
• Lottery Systems: Non-, Positional Frequency, Mega Millions, Powerball, Euromillions
• https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!topic/rec.gambling.lottery/POhE9g-u9XA
• NEW WORLD-RECORD LOTTO WHEEL W(54, 3 of 6) = 274.
• Doollow: “Are they used to generate the RANDOM entry in this year's WLC?”
• I expressed HONESTLY my opinion on WLC on several occasions in this very hou’ Kotkoduck and Kokostirk built. They don’t participate in WLC, either. They regard WLC the same way I do: an exercise in insanity. “One single winning number out of 24 is more valuable than 6 winning numbers — the jackpot!!!”
• You assuredly get better results if applying my lotto-skips systems. The ‘secret” is to go back a number of draws and then create the skips based on the ‘parpaluck’ advised by my software. As you’ve seen, a non-positional skip system hits only 2 times in 100 draws. It’s an average of 50 draws in a 6/49 game. Make it 60 draws in your game.
• So, you go back 60 draws in your history file. In other words, delete the top-60 drawings and save the file under a different name. Create the skips systems based on that file.
• If it happened that your new skip system already hit a ‘6 of 6’ in the last 60 drawings, delete the last 59 draws, etc. Most likely, you don’t have to delete more than 55 past draws off the top of your real-drawings file.
• Instead of skips, you can apply the same strategy in rapport to the MOST FREQUENT lotto numbers.
• After going back 60 draws and creating the skips/frequency system (of 24 numbers), play it for the duration of WLC — unchanged. Your hits will definitely improve. Problem is, everybody else will play the same system! You, the cuckoo participants, can add variation by applying different ‘parpalucks’ (ranges of analyses).
• But be mindful, cuckoos, you “playing’ 134596 combinations multiplied by 20. You must win at least ONE JACKPOT in order to be SUCCESSFUL! Otherwise, you’d be in the same category as the ‘drugged porcupine of the ‘Year of the Eastern Pig’. You’d lose millions, but would shout you made a profit!!!
Parpaluck,
Founder of Lottery Mathematics