Discussion:
WLC 2023 : ROUND 9: 2023 Feb 1
(too old to reply)
NN
2023-01-28 22:35:25 UTC
Permalink
RANDOM : [16, 56, 26, 39, 46, 22, 1, 27, 8, 55, 4, 59, 14, 30, 35, 40, 17, 9, 54, 13, 49, 28, 34, 41]

NIGEL : [56, 26, 39, 46, 22, 1, 27, 8, 55, 4, 59, 14, 30, 35, 40, 17, 9, 54, 13, 49, 28, 34, 41, 16]
Marmaduke Jinks
2023-01-30 09:34:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by NN
RANDOM : [16, 56, 26, 39, 46, 22, 1, 27, 8, 55, 4, 59, 14, 30, 35, 40, 17,
9, 54, 13, 49, 28, 34, 41]
NIGEL : [56, 26, 39, 46, 22, 1, 27, 8, 55, 4, 59, 14, 30, 35, 40, 17, 9,
54, 13, 49, 28, 34, 41, 16]
Cheers NN.

I'll submit all the entries on one email

Elton:
6 49 27 48 1 36 59 54 51 55 45 56 41 39 42 32 17 34 31 38 15 46 22 16

Jerome:
2 29 5 35 41 1 21 3 43 34 59 23 8 31 19 53 7 37 47 13 17 55 40 11

Jinks
21 18 19 53 25 23 58 30 8 4 47 39 44 37 36 24 14 50 57 26 5 7 11 20

:-)
MJ
NN
2023-02-01 00:53:23 UTC
Permalink
[5, 36, 6, 46, 42, 34, 19, 14, 23, 37, 27, 44, 26, 50, 56, 59, 7, 47, 54, 17, 32, 22, 9, 18]
王乾懿 Wang Qianyi (Nan)
2023-02-01 14:22:50 UTC
Permalink
Alphazero
56 14 39 30 8 4 26 46 27 59 17 19 22 1 55 35 40 36 23 37 44 5 6 42
Leela
56 14 39 30 8 4 26 27 46 59 17 19 37 22 1 36 55 21 18 53 25 23 58 47
Nan
56 14 8 39 4 30 27 59 26 46 37 17 36 19 22 55 1 16 35 40 21 18 53 25
王乾懿 Wang Qianyi (Nan)
2023-02-01 15:04:19 UTC
Permalink
It is not clear how much human intelligence plays a role in lottery predictions, as this may be taking place at the quantum level. However, I hope to achieve a better result after several debugging sessions.
Nan
Jerome Fandor
2023-02-01 15:42:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by 王乾懿 Wang Qianyi (Nan)
It is not clear how much human intelligence plays a role in lottery
predictions, as this may be taking place at the quantum level. However, I
hope to achieve a better result after several debugging sessions.
Nan
At a basic level any human being can make a Lotto prediction ;-)

If you can see that a bias exists in the results - like 86% chance of at
least one number being divisible by 3 coming up in the Lotto numbers drawn,
then you're using human intelligence.

J
王乾懿 Wang Qianyi (Nan)
2023-02-02 01:25:37 UTC
Permalink
在 2023年2月1日星期三 UTC+8 23:42:39,<Jerome Fandor> 写道:
Post by Jerome Fandor
Post by 王乾懿 Wang Qianyi (Nan)
It is not clear how much human intelligence plays a role in lottery
predictions, as this may be taking place at the quantum level. However, I
hope to achieve a better result after several debugging sessions.
Nan
At a basic level any human being can make a Lotto prediction ;-)
If you can see that a bias exists in the results - like 86% chance of at
least one number being divisible by 3 coming up in the Lotto numbers drawn,
then you're using human intelligence.
J
thanks for sharing ;-

No matter what statistical method is used, the most accurate long-term results will come from the current probability analysis as well as a comprehensive analysis of the probability at a certain point in the future. Short-term accuracy is equivalent to throwing a dice and will ultimately be limited to the quagmire of stubborn probability.

Nevertheless, lottery prediction is not limited to numbers, you can also predict a general ranking category, thus reducing the unreliability of future predictions. The performance of two horses is clearly superior to the performance of the other two based on their history and recent performance, for example. You are not aware of what their final ranking will be, but you can still make a more accurate prediction, which reduces the difficulty of prediction and the range of options available to you.

Nan
NN
2023-02-02 11:07:57 UTC
Permalink
Result = [16, 28, 29, 31, 53, 59] + bonus= 34


RANDOM caught: {16, 59, 28} +b ==> score: 40
NN caught: {59} +b ==> score: 9
NIGEL caught: {16, 59, 28} +b ==> score: 19
Nan caught: {16, 59, 53} ==> score: 26
Leela caught: {59, 53} ==> score: 20
Alphazero caught: {59} ==> score: 15
Elton caught: {16, 59, 31} +b ==> score: 25
Jerome caught: {29, 59, 53, 31} +b ==> score: 57
Jinks caught: {53} ==> score: 21
--------------------



NN [23, 59, 72, 79, 28, 40, 45, 0, = 355
Jinks [39, 11, 12, 54, 39, 68, 59, 51, = 354
Random [28, 14, 47, 67, 31, 35, 43, 40, = 345
Nan [36, 18, 33, 55, 24, 38, 61, 32, = 323
Nigel [32, 17, 51, 46, 10, 39, 46, 43, = 303
Leela [28, 4, 43, 30, 19, 48, 64, 30, = 286
Jerome [23, 10, 2, 24, 37, 29, 37, 56, = 275
Alphazero [29, 1, 16, 49, 24, 20, 62, 29, = 245
Elton [56, 51, 15, 23, 12, 38, 18, 6, = 244

Well dont to Jerome and Random.
Jinks looks to take the lead setting a new pace....
NN
2023-02-02 11:09:27 UTC
Permalink
NN [23, 59, 72, 79, 28, 40, 45, 0, 9] = 355
Jinks [39, 11, 12, 54, 39, 68, 59, 51, 21] = 354
Random [28, 14, 47, 67, 31, 35, 43, 40, 40] = 345
Nan [36, 18, 33, 55, 24, 38, 61, 32, 26] = 323
Nigel [32, 17, 51, 46, 10, 39, 46, 43, 19] = 303
Leela [28, 4, 43, 30, 19, 48, 64, 30, 20] = 286
Jerome [23, 10, 2, 24, 37, 29, 37, 56, 57] = 275
Alphazero [29, 1, 16, 49, 24, 20, 62, 29, 15] = 245
Elton [56, 51, 15, 23, 12, 38, 18, 6, 25] = 244
NN
2023-02-02 11:13:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by NN
Well dont to Jerome and Random.
Jinks looks to take the lead setting a new pace....
Damn typos !
Well done to Jerome and Random
Marmaduke Jinks
2023-02-02 11:59:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by NN
Post by NN
Well dont to Jerome and Random.
Jinks looks to take the lead setting a new pace....
Damn typos !
Well done to Jerome and Random
Cheers to you :-)

I think we'll find that Jinks won't be able to sustain the pace.

But I'm pleased with the strategy anyway.

MJ
NN
2023-02-02 13:08:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Marmaduke Jinks
Post by NN
Post by NN
Well dont to Jerome and Random.
Jinks looks to take the lead setting a new pace....
Damn typos !
Well done to Jerome and Random
Cheers to you :-)
I think we'll find that Jinks won't be able to sustain the pace.
But I'm pleased with the strategy anyway.
MJ
We are almost half way and in the past this is where I have faltered and slipped.
I did change my method of picking but upon reading Nan's wise words I have gone
back and will stick with it and see what happens.
Marmaduke Jinks
2023-02-02 16:06:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by NN
Post by Marmaduke Jinks
Post by NN
Post by NN
Well dont to Jerome and Random.
Jinks looks to take the lead setting a new pace....
Damn typos !
Well done to Jerome and Random
Cheers to you :-)
I think we'll find that Jinks won't be able to sustain the pace.
But I'm pleased with the strategy anyway.
MJ
We are almost half way and in the past this is where I have faltered and slipped.
I did change my method of picking but upon reading Nan's wise words I have gone
back and will stick with it and see what happens.
Aha. Good luck :-)

MJ
王乾懿 Wang Qianyi (Nan)
2023-02-03 14:45:43 UTC
Permalink
There will come a time when a highly developed civilization will be destroyed, and its seeds will germinate again. Welcome to the new era of civilization.

Next round's outcome will be determined by the development of NN and JINKS civilizations. It is worth considering whether we should follow the civilization where the latecomers prevail, or stick to the civilization that takes the lead and suffers setbacks.

As with any good score, there are always risks involved. As a result, when the cost of this risk is too high, we need to reconsider whether we have chosen the wrong strategic direction for the innovation at the outset.

God's hand is like no other when it comes to writing a novel through prediction

The story continues.
王乾懿 Wang Qianyi (Nan)
2023-02-04 08:44:28 UTC
Permalink
When two relatively powerful civilizations meet, the neutral civilization prompts itself to reflect on its own predictions of unequal numerical interrelationships and guides itself through balance and learning to process creatively through mutual understanding of numerical weighting relationships and learning.
Marmaduke Jinks
2023-02-04 17:19:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by 王乾懿 Wang Qianyi (Nan)
There will come a time when a highly developed civilization will be
destroyed, and its seeds will germinate again. Welcome to the new era of
civilization.
Next round's outcome will be determined by the development of NN and JINKS
civilizations. It is worth considering whether we should follow the
civilization where the latecomers prevail, or stick to the civilization
that takes the lead and suffers setbacks.
As with any good score, there are always risks involved. As a result, when
the cost of this risk is too high, we need to reconsider whether we have
chosen the wrong strategic direction for the innovation at the outset.
God's hand is like no other when it comes to writing a novel through prediction
The story continues.
I'll have whatever he's having ;-)

MJ
nigel
2023-02-06 10:34:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by 王乾懿 Wang Qianyi (Nan)
God's hand is like no other when it comes to writing a novel through prediction
So your God isn't a touch typist because they only use one hand ;-)
王乾懿 Wang Qianyi (Nan)
2023-02-06 14:06:47 UTC
Permalink
在 2023年2月6日星期一 UTC+8 18:34:43,<nigel> 写道:
Post by nigel
Post by 王乾懿 Wang Qianyi (Nan)
God's hand is like no other when it comes to writing a novel through prediction
So your God isn't a touch typist because they only use one hand ;-)
You did figure something out...

nigel
2023-02-02 21:57:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by NN
Post by NN
Well dont to Jerome and Random.
Jinks looks to take the lead setting a new pace....
Damn typos !
Well done to Jerome and Random
I'm tempted to change the name of my entry to Robson, so you might end
up saying well done to Robson and Jerome ;-)
Jerome Fandor
2023-02-03 08:18:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by NN
Well dont to Jerome and Random. Jinks looks to take the lead setting a
new pace....
Damn typos !
Well done to Jerome and Random
I'm tempted to change the name of my entry to Robson, so you might end up
saying well done to Robson and Jerome ;-)
What an unchained melody that would be ;-)

J
Loading...