Discussion:
Euromillions 06 Aug 2024
(too old to reply)
nigel
2024-08-05 09:58:45 UTC
Permalink
[01,02,06,07,10,12,16,19,23,33,34,37,38,39,42,44,47,48,50] Very, Very
Long List

[02,06,34,37,39] Bankers

The large quantity of qualifying numbers ought to be a sign of
convergence, which ought to be a good thing. However I'm more interested
the the large number of bankers. That has the power to greatly influence
my statistics for better or worse.
Marmaduke Jinks
2024-08-05 12:08:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by nigel
[01,02,06,07,10,12,16,19,23,33,34,37,38,39,42,44,47,48,50] Very, Very
Long List
[02,06,34,37,39] Bankers
The large quantity of qualifying numbers ought to be a sign of
convergence, which ought to be a good thing. However I'm more interested
the the large number of bankers. That has the power to greatly influence
my statistics for better or worse.
When I did a bit of analysis "back in the day" I found that the numbers
that tended to re-occur were from Draw 1, then draw 2, then draw 3, then
draw 4 etc. Although very tenuous it's the closest I would consider to
a "banker".

MJ
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com
NN
2024-08-06 17:57:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Marmaduke Jinks
Post by nigel
[01,02,06,07,10,12,16,19,23,33,34,37,38,39,42,44,47,48,50] Very, Very
Long List
[02,06,34,37,39] Bankers
The large quantity of qualifying numbers ought to be a sign of
convergence, which ought to be a good thing. However I'm more
interested the the large number of bankers. That has the power to
greatly influence my statistics for better or worse.
When I did a bit of analysis "back in the day" I found that the numbers
that tended to re-occur were from Draw 1, then draw 2, then draw 3, then
draw 4 etc.  Although very tenuous it's the closest I would consider to
a "banker".
MJ
[16, 46, 27, 22, 28, 5, 12, 24]
NN
2024-08-07 11:44:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by NN
Post by Marmaduke Jinks
Post by nigel
[01,02,06,07,10,12,16,19,23,33,34,37,38,39,42,44,47,48,50] Very, Very
Long List
[02,06,34,37,39] Bankers
The large quantity of qualifying numbers ought to be a sign of
convergence, which ought to be a good thing. However I'm more
interested the the large number of bankers. That has the power to
greatly influence my statistics for better or worse.
When I did a bit of analysis "back in the day" I found that the
numbers that tended to re-occur were from Draw 1, then draw 2, then
draw 3, then draw 4 etc.  Although very tenuous it's the closest I
would consider to a "banker".
MJ
[16, 46, 27, 22, 28, 5, 12, 24]
result =[01 18 27 41 50 (02 12) ]

Nigel =[1,50] bankers[ (2)]

Me =[27 (12)]
nigel
2024-08-07 14:53:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by NN
Post by NN
Post by Marmaduke Jinks
Post by nigel
[01,02,06,07,10,12,16,19,23,33,34,37,38,39,42,44,47,48,50] Very,
Very Long List
[02,06,34,37,39] Bankers
The large quantity of qualifying numbers ought to be a sign of
convergence, which ought to be a good thing. However I'm more
interested the the large number of bankers. That has the power to
greatly influence my statistics for better or worse.
When I did a bit of analysis "back in the day" I found that the
numbers that tended to re-occur were from Draw 1, then draw 2, then
draw 3, then draw 4 etc. Although very tenuous it's the closest I
would consider to a "banker".
MJ
[16, 46, 27, 22, 28, 5, 12, 24]
result =[01 18 27 41 50 (02 12) ]
Nigel =[1,50] bankers[ (2)]
Me =[27 (12)]
Thanks.

I got 2 from 19 - that's better than expecation! Just!

Loading...